Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:34

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
007 First Light Trailer Reveals The First-Ever James Bond Origin Story - GameSpot
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What can we learn from the fatal shooting of UnitedHealth CEO Brian Thompson?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What is the best skin care routine product for oily skin?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
One of Pop’s Hottest Stars Posted a Risqué Album Cover. All Hell Broke Loose. - Slate Magazine
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sleep Quality Shapes Jealousy in Insecure Relationships - Neuroscience News
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.